angelhealer Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:33 pm
I'm going to be frank I agree with both of you, from my own experience it took me three hours of being in the now to channel a full blown message. It was my first and it was from Archangel Michael who I speak to on a regular basis. However, this is what I say, I always think for most people it is ego based. I say this because you can tell they use big words not simple everyday language that all people will come to understand.
As an angel medium I am always up for skeptism but one thing I learn is that the when the truth comes through there is always an inner knowing if has come from the heart and genuine matter of thought. When certain individuals reel out messages as long as a board, they are confusing and maybe not negative but there is too much information and waffle. When I read true readings they are direct to the point. Also I have over say three years only done about 4 longish channellings and I always know exactly who they are... other channellings should only be a few words or sentences at most. That's my personal opinion. I guess it's open to opinon too.
I say what my friend told me. For a spirit to pass a message they need suffcient energy to get it across and that is why you mainly hear a few words mostly. It makes sense to me..
I do not doubt that people genuinely do channel, but to me it's iffy when it's to go to my website or my site etc.. it is ego orientated.
Most readings are all about the ascension the energy and it's like to someone who don't know what that is, there is the opportunity that they will be vulernable and get pulled in.
I have channeled AA MIchael and it was all about forgiveness and love... and the other long channelling I did was in a park it was a personal message I think from michael or metatron.
thank you
angelhealer